patiently_waiting
04-05 10:04 PM
if you have copy of I-140 , it contains 13 digit receipt number (SRC, WAC etc..).
Enter the number in USCIS case status to find out the latest update on the I-140 file @ https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/Dashboard.do
Enter the number in USCIS case status to find out the latest update on the I-140 file @ https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/Dashboard.do
wallpaper fun and interesting facts
sathishkrish
11-28 08:33 PM
As I understand the process, if your date is current, the USCIS will accept your application - meaning they ARE processing applications with a priority date matching or exceeding yours.
During the July 2007 fiasco, the cut-off dates were current, allowing everyone to apply. If we submitted our application and the date is current at the time, why do we have to wait until our date becomes current again? Shouldn't they process the application within 6 months or less?
You application will continue to be processed when it is within the processing time - visa allocation happens only when your PD is current, which apparently is not. Moreover - Visa Bulletin is just a Forecast based on current demand so, actuals can vary at any time. There is so much to read about this in many forums including this, so you may want do more research before asking - I have a reason to tell you this because your poor soul will soon be hounded by GURUS for not researching enough :-) Hope you understand!
Cheers
During the July 2007 fiasco, the cut-off dates were current, allowing everyone to apply. If we submitted our application and the date is current at the time, why do we have to wait until our date becomes current again? Shouldn't they process the application within 6 months or less?
You application will continue to be processed when it is within the processing time - visa allocation happens only when your PD is current, which apparently is not. Moreover - Visa Bulletin is just a Forecast based on current demand so, actuals can vary at any time. There is so much to read about this in many forums including this, so you may want do more research before asking - I have a reason to tell you this because your poor soul will soon be hounded by GURUS for not researching enough :-) Hope you understand!
Cheers
Blog Feeds
12-18 09:50 AM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_QZpVppv4FTs/SyoktlFrwGI/AAAAAAAAACE/_s8HO4huoXY/s320/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg (http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_QZpVppv4FTs/SyoktlFrwGI/AAAAAAAAACE/_s8HO4huoXY/s1600-h/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg)There was some good news Wednesday for asylum seekers. ICE assistant secretary John Morton announced that the government would no longer detain them if they can prove their identities, are not dangerous or a flight risk, and have a credible fear of persecution or torture in their home countries. http://bit.ly/4LM3F1
But it might be a tad early to celebrate.
The details of the plan are not yet clear. As Professor Regina Germaine of the Georgetown University Law Center observed in an email message to an Immigration Professors' Listserve, "the criteria for release has always been (since 1996) the 3 factors mentioned by John Morton - 1) ID, 2) not a danger or flight risk, and 3) credible fear. And the lack of one or more of these factors is cited when ICE refuses to release someone."
So, has Morton announced a new policy or has he simply restated the existing policy in a way which suggests release, but, in fact, will lead to continued detention of asylum seekers?
Another unanswered issue is whether the policy will be followed by ICE officers throughout the country. Professor Margaret Taylor of Wake Forest University suggests it's an open question. "Hopefully there will be 'buy in' and compliance in the field offices with this policy, but history suggests otherwise."
For now let's take the Administration at its word. But time will tell whether the draconian policy of incarcerating people who seek refuge in America has finally come to an end.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-808347624409550952?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/12/ice-announces-it-will-no-longer-detain.html)
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_QZpVppv4FTs/SyoktlFrwGI/AAAAAAAAACE/_s8HO4huoXY/s320/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg (http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_QZpVppv4FTs/SyoktlFrwGI/AAAAAAAAACE/_s8HO4huoXY/s1600-h/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg)There was some good news Wednesday for asylum seekers. ICE assistant secretary John Morton announced that the government would no longer detain them if they can prove their identities, are not dangerous or a flight risk, and have a credible fear of persecution or torture in their home countries. http://bit.ly/4LM3F1
But it might be a tad early to celebrate.
The details of the plan are not yet clear. As Professor Regina Germaine of the Georgetown University Law Center observed in an email message to an Immigration Professors' Listserve, "the criteria for release has always been (since 1996) the 3 factors mentioned by John Morton - 1) ID, 2) not a danger or flight risk, and 3) credible fear. And the lack of one or more of these factors is cited when ICE refuses to release someone."
So, has Morton announced a new policy or has he simply restated the existing policy in a way which suggests release, but, in fact, will lead to continued detention of asylum seekers?
Another unanswered issue is whether the policy will be followed by ICE officers throughout the country. Professor Margaret Taylor of Wake Forest University suggests it's an open question. "Hopefully there will be 'buy in' and compliance in the field offices with this policy, but history suggests otherwise."
For now let's take the Administration at its word. But time will tell whether the draconian policy of incarcerating people who seek refuge in America has finally come to an end.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-808347624409550952?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/12/ice-announces-it-will-no-longer-detain.html)
2011 facts,interesting facts
misscoolu
07-29 01:34 PM
Hi..
I came to US on H4. My H1B got approved when i was in India. But I came through H4 only.
Now i want to change H4 to H1B. If i want to apply for change of status..do i need to go back to india(ot other countries) for stamping? Or can i get H1B staying here?
Please help..
I came to US on H4. My H1B got approved when i was in India. But I came through H4 only.
Now i want to change H4 to H1B. If i want to apply for change of status..do i need to go back to india(ot other countries) for stamping? Or can i get H1B staying here?
Please help..
more...
EB2_Jun03_dude
12-11 01:56 PM
I had a RFE against my I-485 in last week of Nov 07. It was for medical exam, doc forgot to check one box :(
Now the RFE has been replied to and USCIS should hopefully have no further questions on my application. But now the issue is retrogression of EB2 India back to Jan 02 (while I am Jun 03). So does that mean though my application could be cleared by the immigration officer, it will still be put back on shelf because of the retrogression in Dec 07 ?
Now the RFE has been replied to and USCIS should hopefully have no further questions on my application. But now the issue is retrogression of EB2 India back to Jan 02 (while I am Jun 03). So does that mean though my application could be cleared by the immigration officer, it will still be put back on shelf because of the retrogression in Dec 07 ?
zico123
06-08 01:37 AM
I talked to an attorney and he said that she can file but likelihood of getting another extension is very low.
Talk to a competent attorney. Medical reasons are seen as EXCEPTIONAL cases by USCIS. If the illness is serious enough she will be given preferential treatment and might get visa waiver for the duration of her treatment. A proper attorney can advise further.
Talk to a competent attorney. Medical reasons are seen as EXCEPTIONAL cases by USCIS. If the illness is serious enough she will be given preferential treatment and might get visa waiver for the duration of her treatment. A proper attorney can advise further.
more...
fromnaija
02-15 05:16 PM
Thanks fromnaija, If she maintains any non-immigrant visa she can be added without any 'follow-to-join' petetion right i.e., she can be added to my 485 just like the normal process when my PD becomes current.
Yes that's correct as long as the marriage occurs prior to when you want to add her.
Yes that's correct as long as the marriage occurs prior to when you want to add her.
2010 2010 weird or fun facts.
illusions
03-24 11:36 AM
sent u a PM, hope it helps.
more...
Allyblue
09-15 05:50 AM
The tutorials are really cool, but I am stuck at the same place :)
Hi Gazman,
You are right - that part of the tutorial is completely broken, and I need to modify it a bit. I am not 100% of the changes you need to make yet, but I will post an example shortly with the changes :)
Cheers!
Kirupa
Hi Gazman,
You are right - that part of the tutorial is completely broken, and I need to modify it a bit. I am not 100% of the changes you need to make yet, but I will post an example shortly with the changes :)
Cheers!
Kirupa
hair Tags: weird facts.
gc4arun
07-06 11:38 AM
Besides, depending upon how the "CLASS" is defined- you will not lose your claim if they win the lawsuit.
It does not require you to have filed your case to benefit from the class action , but it depends on how the class has been defined. You can goto Rajiv's website and hear the latest conference call recording which explains his opinion on this.
A
It does not require you to have filed your case to benefit from the class action , but it depends on how the class has been defined. You can goto Rajiv's website and hear the latest conference call recording which explains his opinion on this.
A
more...
factoryman
06-19 11:00 PM
supplemental 693. No brainer. All do.
Did anyone's doctor attach the following supplement to their application or am I the only one ?
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dq/pdf/ti-03/appdx-a_693vacc.pdf
Did anyone's doctor attach the following supplement to their application or am I the only one ?
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dq/pdf/ti-03/appdx-a_693vacc.pdf
hot Best weird funny facts
viz
02-01 10:29 PM
I am wondering about exact same thing. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
more...
house and interesting facts.
dreamgc_real
04-29 12:42 PM
Since your h1b transfer is approved, there is nothing to worry; and your pd will remain the same. good luck.
tattoo Weird Facts - 1.0
ca_immigrant
02-05 01:41 PM
Apologies if I should have looked this up somewhere within IV .
Guess it is a simple question.
What does a soft LUD mean ? I have often read that term on the forum.
I at times see that something was updated on my case..."last updated date" but then there is no status update.....for example this happened on my I131 application on Feb 4, 2009
On the I485 I think it is just that they transferred it from one office to another as the status says.
=============================
Last updated | Form number
2/4/2009 | I131
2/5/2009 | I485
===============================
Guess it is a simple question.
What does a soft LUD mean ? I have often read that term on the forum.
I at times see that something was updated on my case..."last updated date" but then there is no status update.....for example this happened on my I131 application on Feb 4, 2009
On the I485 I think it is just that they transferred it from one office to another as the status says.
=============================
Last updated | Form number
2/4/2009 | I131
2/5/2009 | I485
===============================
more...
pictures Random Fun Facts.
HPBPoPoIII
02-27 11:31 AM
It took me some time to figure it out too...I actualy looked at some flash tutorals for tweening and thats how i figured out how to make the car move.
dresses and interesting facts.
BharatPremi
04-24 03:51 PM
FP completed...What Next?
PF
Probable Fatigue
PF
Probable Fatigue
more...
makeup 20 fun facts about
Horace Jones
07-23 06:02 PM
Has anyone considered: In Arizona, what's going to happen to all of the immigrants who are there perfectly legally and are actually creating American jobs via the EB5 green card program? Will the be harassed? I say probably.
girlfriend Best weird funny facts
vin13
07-19 10:59 AM
LOL..its good to have a sense of humor.
I wish there was a way to know if a case is pre-adjudicated.
This would help us to not file for H1 extensions, EAD, and AP. Which inturn would free up time for the officers to work on improving processing dates.
Offcourse, i am still happy about the date movement.
It just makes you wonder , if they USCIS was deligent in not wasting visas in previous years, even EB-3 would have had a reasonable date.
EB-2
priority date:March 05
July 07 filer
I wish there was a way to know if a case is pre-adjudicated.
This would help us to not file for H1 extensions, EAD, and AP. Which inturn would free up time for the officers to work on improving processing dates.
Offcourse, i am still happy about the date movement.
It just makes you wonder , if they USCIS was deligent in not wasting visas in previous years, even EB-3 would have had a reasonable date.
EB-2
priority date:March 05
July 07 filer
hairstyles and interesting facts.
marty
12-11 12:09 PM
I thought they changed their mindset from having no movement most of the year then jumping ahead several years in the last quarter and playing catch up.. this is what got them the 07 fiasco
but apparently they are repeating the trend
this no movement for ROW makes no sense at all
Seriously, I was disappointed with the JAN 09 VB. I am thinking of applying for EB3 to EB2 but I don't know if I can do that. I had two years experience before joining my current employer and now I have served almost 6 years with them that bring it to total of 8 years.
but apparently they are repeating the trend
this no movement for ROW makes no sense at all
Seriously, I was disappointed with the JAN 09 VB. I am thinking of applying for EB3 to EB2 but I don't know if I can do that. I had two years experience before joining my current employer and now I have served almost 6 years with them that bring it to total of 8 years.
EB3Victim
09-20 10:43 PM
The USCIS provided further clarification and instructions on I-140 premium processing following the initial announcement. They listed three types of cases that are not eligible for premium processing, even if they are within the EB3 preference category. These are:
a second I-140 filing, if an initial I-140 remains pending
a labor certification substitution request
a duplicate labor certification requests (i.e. those cases where the original labor certification is not included)
These cases simply have additional processing requirements that cannot be met within the premium processing timeframe. These exceptions are in addition to the EB3 �other worker� cases which, as mentioned above, are not eligible for premium processing.
Go through the below link
http://www.murthy.com/news/n_eb3140.html
a second I-140 filing, if an initial I-140 remains pending
a labor certification substitution request
a duplicate labor certification requests (i.e. those cases where the original labor certification is not included)
These cases simply have additional processing requirements that cannot be met within the premium processing timeframe. These exceptions are in addition to the EB3 �other worker� cases which, as mentioned above, are not eligible for premium processing.
Go through the below link
http://www.murthy.com/news/n_eb3140.html
sb724
06-26 11:49 PM
Helo all,
Thanks for you advises.
Here is my case details. GC is under retrogression
PD is 09/2005, concurrently filed both I140 and 485, AP and EAD on Dec 2004at California Center , but employer located at NJ. According to attorney as I am working in CA, he has to file at CA. Dependent's 485 is not applied and now she is in US on H4. Never used AP and EAD. Working on H1 with GC sposor employer only.
I140 got approved in Aug 2005. Applied for 7 th year extension for me and dependent. Got approved for three years based on approved I140
Now I want to move to Texas and want to transfer H1 to new employer using AC21. Can I relocate from CA to Texas( In ETA forms Job location is mentioned as Undecided) and can I get 3 years H1 transfer approval through new employer?
New employer will give offer letter as Programmer Analyst with very good salary than current, but he is requesting to work as QA for some time at client place in Texas. Can I work in different job responsibilities at cleint though new employer's offer letter says Programmer Analyst with same job responsibilities mentioned in Labor?
Please advise me
Regards
ak
Thanks for you advises.
Here is my case details. GC is under retrogression
PD is 09/2005, concurrently filed both I140 and 485, AP and EAD on Dec 2004at California Center , but employer located at NJ. According to attorney as I am working in CA, he has to file at CA. Dependent's 485 is not applied and now she is in US on H4. Never used AP and EAD. Working on H1 with GC sposor employer only.
I140 got approved in Aug 2005. Applied for 7 th year extension for me and dependent. Got approved for three years based on approved I140
Now I want to move to Texas and want to transfer H1 to new employer using AC21. Can I relocate from CA to Texas( In ETA forms Job location is mentioned as Undecided) and can I get 3 years H1 transfer approval through new employer?
New employer will give offer letter as Programmer Analyst with very good salary than current, but he is requesting to work as QA for some time at client place in Texas. Can I work in different job responsibilities at cleint though new employer's offer letter says Programmer Analyst with same job responsibilities mentioned in Labor?
Please advise me
Regards
ak
